From cube-lovers-errors@mc.lcs.mit.edu  Tue Jul  6 18:54:46 1999
Return-Path: <cube-lovers-errors@mc.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sun28.aic.nrl.navy.mil (sun28.aic.nrl.navy.mil [132.250.84.38])
	by mc.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1-mod) with SMTP id SAA07213
	for <cube-lovers-outbound@mc.lcs.mit.edu>; Tue, 6 Jul 1999 18:54:46 -0400 (EDT)
Precedence: bulk
Errors-To: cube-lovers-errors@mc.lcs.mit.edu
Reply-To: <noel@mud.ca>
From: "Noel Dillabough" <noel@mud.ca>
To: "Cube Lovers List (E-mail)" <cube-lovers@ai.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: Solution to a size 2 Octahedron
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 19:17:23 -0400
Message-Id: <000601bec4e1$19d7a080$0ef5ddce@laptop>

[Moderator's note: Isn't a corners-based octahedron just a face-based cube
 with the corners flattened and the faces made pointy?  I think BFTDLR or
 BFUDLR would work for notation. --Dan]

Actually this notation works perfectly, here is the move in this fashion:

R' F' R F2 R' F2 R F2 R' F