From cube-lovers-errors@mc.lcs.mit.edu  Wed Apr  7 16:33:55 1999
Return-Path: <cube-lovers-errors@mc.lcs.mit.edu>
Received: from sun28.aic.nrl.navy.mil (sun28.aic.nrl.navy.mil [132.250.84.38])
	by mc.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1-mod) with SMTP id QAA26292
	for <cube-lovers-outbound@mc.lcs.mit.edu>; Wed, 7 Apr 1999 16:33:55 -0400 (EDT)
Precedence: bulk
Errors-To: cube-lovers-errors@mc.lcs.mit.edu
Reply-To: <jburkhardt@mediaone.net>
From: "John Burkhardt" <jburkhardt@mediaone.net>
To: "'Cube-Lovers (E-mail)'" <cube-lovers@ai.mit.edu>
Subject: RE: Different versions of the Ideal cube
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 1999 06:29:31 -0400
Message-Id: <001001be8018$5c165350$3cca8018@octopod.ne.mediaone.net>

> [ Moderator: The archives have quite a bit about various types of
>   cubes.  Are you sure the open-corner cubes were from Ideal?  I
>   thought those were the pirated knockoffs. ]
>

Yes, I'm sure the open corner cubes I have are Ideal.  Unless the pirates
put them in Ideal boxes.  I own three Ideal cubes.  I also have a siamese
cube, which looks like it started life as regular Ideal cubes and those
corners are closed.  And the new OddzOn cubes are solid too.

-JRB