From cube-lovers-errors@mc.lcs.mit.edu Thu Nov 13 13:15:59 1997 Return-Path: Received: from sun30.aic.nrl.navy.mil by mc.lcs.mit.edu (8.8.1/mc) with SMTP id NAA05230; Thu, 13 Nov 1997 13:15:58 -0500 (EST) Precedence: bulk Errors-To: cube-lovers-errors@mc.lcs.mit.edu Mail-from: From richard_morton@icom-solutions.com Wed Nov 12 04:56:12 1997 Message-Id: <199711120955.EAA01537@life.ai.mit.edu> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 1997 04:55:28 EST From: "Richard M Morton" To: cube-lovers@ai.mit.edu Subject: Cube Colours Mark Longridge wrote: > First of all, the STANDARD colour arrangement used by Ideal Toy is as > follows: > > UP = White > DOWN = Blue > FRONT = Yellow > BACK = Green > LEFT = Red > RIGHT = Orange Is the orientation of the above fixed in some way or is it arbitrary ? My second cube (can't remember what happened to the first one) is a later edition (not sure if it is Ideal) with the same arrangement to above except, the orientation is different (UP is either RED or ORANGE) The reason I say this is that the LEFT,RIGHT,DOWN and FRONT faces have symbols printed in the centre as follows : YELLOW - signature of Erno Rubik WHITE - Rubik's CUBE tm GREEN - C*4**4 (actually uses superscript 4 for the power) BLUE - silhouette (of Erno Rubik) The symbols are designed to make the cube harder to solve - the challenge is to solve the cube with the centre cubes all in the correct orientation. I recall that there are sequences of moves that rotate pairs of centre cubes. This cube is definitely a lot stiffer than my original cube but the novelty of speed cubing has worn off anyway. Richard Morton (If my employers views are not necessarily those of my own, why am I still working here ?) Icom Solutions http://www.icom-solutions.com/offprods/default.htm