From mschoene%math.rwth-aachen.de@samson.math.rwth-aachen.de Thu May 25 09:39:22 1995 Return-Path: Received: from LCS.MIT.EDU (mintaka.lcs.mit.edu) by life.ai.mit.edu (4.1/AI-4.10) for /com/archive/cube-lovers id AA10425; Thu, 25 May 95 09:39:22 EDT Received: from samson.math.rwth-aachen.de by MINTAKA.LCS.MIT.EDU id aa23524; 25 May 95 6:19 EDT Received: from hobbes.math.rwth-aachen.de by samson.math.rwth-aachen.de with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #11) id m0sEa08-000MPEC; Thu, 25 May 95 12:18 MET DST Received: by hobbes.math.rwth-aachen.de (Smail3.1.28.1 #19) id m0sEa07-00026WC; Thu, 25 May 95 12:18 WET DST Message-Id: Date: Thu, 25 May 95 12:18 WET DST From: "Martin Schoenert" To: Cube-Lovers@lcs.mit.edu Cc: BRYAN@wvnvm.wvnet.edu In-Reply-To: "Jerry Bryan"'s message of Wed, 24 May 1995 16:36:30 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: Re: AntiSlice Under M-conjugacy (and a problem with slice) Jerry Bryan wrote Just to give an example that I am familiar with, suppose the group in question were M itself. Then, NumberConjugacyClasses should yield 10, because the 48 elements in M yield 10 conjugacy classes under M-conjugation. If anybody who has GAP also has defined M, you might give it a try. GAP also thinks that M has 10 conjugacy classes (under M-conjugation). Martin. -- .- .-. - .. -. .-.. --- ...- . ... .- -. -. .. -.- .- Martin Sch"onert, Martin.Schoenert@Math.RWTH-Aachen.DE, +49 241 804551 Lehrstuhl D f"ur Mathematik, Templergraben 64, RWTH, 52056 Aachen, Germany