From mreid@ptc.com Sun Jan 8 16:28:22 1995 Return-Path: Received: from ptc.com (poster.ptc.com) by life.ai.mit.edu (4.1/AI-4.10) for /com/archive/cube-lovers id AA11881; Sun, 8 Jan 95 16:28:22 EST Received: from ducie.ptc.com by ptc.com (5.0/SMI-SVR4-NN) id AA11783; Sun, 8 Jan 95 16:26:58 EST Received: by ducie.ptc.com (1.38.193.4/sendmail.28-May-87) id AA07811; Sun, 8 Jan 1995 16:39:27 -0500 Date: Sun, 8 Jan 1995 16:39:27 -0500 From: mreid@ptc.com (michael reid) Message-Id: <9501082139.AA07811@ducie.ptc.com> To: dik@cwi.nl, cube-lovers@ai.mit.edu Subject: Re: two stage filtration Content-Length: 714 dik writes > I can confirm Mike's results on phase 1. great! > Here follows my table which > also contains the number of local maxima (which you will not find in > "backward" steps): this is true. i decided i was more interested in performance than in knowing about local maxima. > I will try to verify phase 2 later next week. let me offer a suggestion here. since i divided the corner configurations by symmetry, it might be nicer if you divide the U-D edge configurations by symmetry. (the numbers involved are the same.) it's always nice to confirm a calculation like this using a different method. although what i'm suggesting isn't much of a change. mike