From mindcrf!peabody.mindcraft.com!ronnie@decwrl.dec.com Fri May 10 19:16:47 1991
Return-Path:
Received: from uucp-gw-1.pa.dec.com by life.ai.mit.edu (4.1/AI-4.10) id AA24712; Fri, 10 May 91 19:16:47 EDT
Received: by uucp-gw-1.pa.dec.com; id AA29291; Fri, 10 May 91 16:16:33 -0700
Received: by mindcrf.mindcraft.com (AIX 2.1 2/4.03)
id AA10398; Mon, 6 May 91 11:02:49 PDT
Received: by peabody.mindcraft.com (AIX 1.3/4.03)
id AA22955; Mon, 6 May 91 11:14:02 -0700
Date: Mon, 6 May 91 11:14:02 -0700
From: mindcrf!ronnie@peabody.mindcraft.com (Ronnie Kon)
Message-Id: <9105061814.AA22955@peabody.mindcraft.com>
To: @mindcrf.pa.dec.com:decwrl!ai.ai.mit.edu!Cube-Lovers
Subject: 5by cubes
As far as I can tell, if you can solve the order 3 and order 4 cube,
you should be able to solve the order 5 with no additional fiddling, even if
you only know cookbook solutions.
Spoiler follows:
I solve the off-center edges first (just like in the order 4 cube--
the transformations are identical), then the corners (exactly like all other
orders, from 2 through 4), then the center edges (exactly like the order 3
cube, just treat the two edge faces as attached and you have an order 3
cube). All that's left are the eight centers. Four of these can be solved
exactly as in the order 4, and if you can't generalize your cookbook solution
to solve the remaining 4 you have no business cubing.
I suspect this is why there are (and will probably never be) cubes of
orders greater than 5. I believe (though have not proved) that the 5 cube
contains all the complexity that is possible. Adding more cubies would only
increase the amount of time needed to solve.
On the other hand, I would be willing to pay a fair amount of money for
an order 21 cube. :-)
Ronnie